(Redirected from BGM-109 Tomahawk)
Department of the navy headquarters united states marine corps 3000 marine corps pentagon washington. Dc mco 5500.6h ps 26 aug 11 marine corps order 5500.6h.
Tomahawk | |
---|---|
Type | Long-range, all-weather, subsonic cruise missile |
Place of origin | United States |
Service history | |
In service | 1983–present |
Used by | United States Navy Royal Navy |
Production history | |
Manufacturer | General Dynamics (initially) McDonnell Douglas Hughes Aircraft Corporation Raytheon |
Unit cost | $1.87M (FY2017)[1] (Block IV) |
Specifications | |
Mass | 2,900 lb (1,300 kg), 3,500 lb (1,600 kg) with booster |
Length | Without booster: 18 ft 3 in (5.56 m)With booster: 20 ft 6 in (6.25 m) |
Diameter | 20.4 in (0.52 m) |
Warhead | Nuclear: W80 warhead (retired)[2] Conventional: 1,000 pounds (450 kg) high explosive or submunition dispenser with BLU-97/B Combined Effects Bomb or PBXN |
Detonation mechanism | FMU-148 since TLAM Block III, others for special applications |
Engine | Williams InternationalF107-WR-402turbofan using TH-dimer fuel and a solid-fuel rocket booster |
Wingspan | 8 ft 9 in (2.67 m) |
Block II TLAM-A – 1,350 nmi (1,550 mi; 2,500 km) Block III TLAM-C, Block IV TLAM-E – 900 nmi (1,000 mi; 1,700 km) Block III TLAM-D – 700 nmi (810 mi; 1,300 km)[3] | |
Flight altitude | 98–164 ft (30–50 m) AGL[4] |
Speed | Subsonic; ~Mach 0.74. about 550 mph (480 kn; 890 km/h) |
Guidance system | GPS, INS, TERCOM, DSMAC, active radar homing (RGM/UGM-109B) |
Vertical Launch System (VLS) and horizontal submarine torpedo tubes (known as TTL (torpedo tube launch)) |
The Tomahawk (/ˈtɒməhɔːk/) Land Attack Missile (TLAM) is a long-range, all-weather, subsoniccruise missile that is primarily used by the United States Navy and Royal Navy in ship and submarine-based land-attack operations. Introduced by General Dynamics in the 1970s, it was initially designed as a medium- to long-range, low-altitude missile that could be launched from a surface platform. Since then, it has been upgraded several times with guidance systems for precision navigation. In 1992–1994, McDonnell Douglas Corporation was the sole supplier of Tomahawk Missiles and produced Block II and Block III Tomahawk missiles and remanufactured many Tomahawks to Block III specifications.[5] In 1994, Hughes outbid McDonnell Douglas Aerospace to become the sole supplier of Tomahawk missiles. It is now manufactured by Raytheon.[6] In 2016, the U.S. Department of Defense purchased 149 Tomahawk Block IV missiles for $202.3 million.[1]
- 7Operational history
- 8Operators
Description[edit]
The Tomahawk missile family consists of a number of subsonic, jet engine-powered missiles designed to attack a variety of surface targets. Although several launch platforms have been deployed or envisaged, only sea (both surface ship and submarine) launched variants are currently in service. Tomahawk has a modular design, allowing a wide variety of warhead, guidance, and range capabilities. The Tomahawk project was originally awarded to Applied Physics Laboratory near Laurel, Maryland by the US Navy. James H. Walker led a team of scientists to design and build this new long range missile. The original design, updated with advanced technology, is still used today.
Variants[edit]
![550 550](/uploads/1/2/4/9/124912887/170252201.gif)
There have been several variants of the BGM-109 Tomahawk employing various types of warheads.
- BGM-109A Tomahawk Land Attack Missile – Nuclear (TLAM-N) with a W80 nuclear warhead. Retired from service sometime between 2010 and 2013.[2] Reports from early 2018 state that the U.S. Navy is considering (re)introducing a (yet unknown type of) nuclear-tipped cruise missile into service.[7]
- RGM/UGM-109B Tomahawk Anti Ship Missile (TASM) – active radar hominganti-ship missile variant; withdrawn from service in 1994 and converted to Block IV version.[3]
- BGM-109C Tomahawk Land Attack Missile – Conventional (TLAM-C) with a unitary warhead. This was initially a modified Bullpup warhead.
- BGM-109D Tomahawk Land Attack Missile – Dispenser (TLAM-D) with cluster munitions.[8]
- RGM/UGM-109E Tomahawk Land Attack Missile (TLAM Block IV) – improved version of the TLAM-C.[3]
- BGM-109G Ground Launched Cruise Missile (GLCM) – with a W84 nuclear warhead; withdrawn from service in 1991 to comply with the INF Treaty.[3]
- AGM-109H/L Medium Range Air to Surface Missile (MRASM) – a shorter range, turbojet powered air-launched cruise missile with cluster munitions; never entered service, cost US$569,000 (1999).[9]
Ground-launched cruise missiles (GLCM) and their truck-like launch vehicles were employed at bases in Europe; they were withdrawn from service to comply with the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty.[3] Many of the anti-ship versions were converted into TLAMs at the end of the Cold War.[7] The Block III TLAMs that entered service in 1993 can fly 3 percent farther using their new turbofan engines[3] and use Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers to strike more precisely.[7] Block III TLAM-Cs retain the Digital Scene Matching Area Correlation (DSMAC) II navigation system, allowing GPS only missions, which allow for rapid mission planning, with some reduced accuracy, DSMAC only missions, which take longer to plan but terminal accuracy is somewhat better, and GPS aided missions which combine both DSMAC II and GPS navigation which provides the greatest accuracy.[3] Block IV TLAMs have an improved turbofan engine allowing for throttle control, allowing in-flight speed changes, as well as better fuel economy and quicker launch times.[3] The Block IV TLAMs have enhanced loiter capabilities and are equipped with a real-time targeting system for striking fleeing targets as well as onboard electro-optical sensors allowing for real-time battle damage assessment.[3] Additionally, the Block IV missiles have the capabilities to be retargeted inflight, and the ability to transmit, via satcom, an image immediately prior to impact to assist in determining if the missile was attacking the target and the likely damage from the attack.[3]
Upgrades[edit]
UGM-109 Tomahawk missile detonates above a test target, 1986
A major improvement to the Tomahawk is network-centric warfare-capabilities, using data from multiple sensors (aircraft, UAVs, satellites, foot soldiers, tanks, ships) to find its target. It will also be able to send data from its sensors to these platforms. It will be a part of the networked force being implemented by the Pentagon.
Tomahawk Block II variants were all tested during January 1981 to October 1983. Deployed in 1984, some of the improvements included: an improved booster rocket, cruise missile radar altimeter, and navigation through the Digital Scene Matching Area Corellator (DSMAC).[10]
Tomahawk Block III introduced in 1993 added time-of-arrival control and improved accuracy for Digital Scene Matching Area Correlator (DSMAC) and jam-resistant GPS, smaller, lighter WDU-36 warhead, engine improvements and extended missile's range.[9][11]
Tactical Tomahawk Weapons Control System (TTWCS) takes advantage of a loitering feature in the missile's flight path and allows commanders to redirect the missile to an alternative target, if required. It can be reprogrammed in-flight to attack predesignated targets with GPS coordinates stored in its memory or to any other GPS coordinates. Also, the missile can send data about its status back to the commander. It entered service with the US Navy in late 2004. The Tactical Tomahawk Weapons Control System (TTWCS) added the capability for limited mission planning on board the firing unit (FRU).[12]
Tomahawk Block IV introduced in 2006 adds the strike controller which can change the missile in flight to one of 15 preprogrammed alternate targets or redirect it to a new target. This targeting flexibility includes the capability to loiter over the battlefield awaiting a more critical target. The missile can also transmit battle damage indication imagery and missile health and status messages via the two-way satellite data link. Firing platforms now have the capability to plan and execute GPS-only missions. Block IV also has an improved anti-jam GPS receiver for enhanced mission performance.Block IV includes Tomahawk Weapons Control System (TTWCS), and Tomahawk Command and Control System (TC2S).[13][14][15]
On 16 August 2010, the Navy completed the first live test of the Joint Multi-Effects Warhead System (JMEWS), a new warhead designed to give the Tomahawk the same blast-fragmentation capabilities while introducing enhanced penetration capabilities in a single warhead. In the static test, the warhead detonated and created a hole large enough for the follow-through element to completely penetrate the concrete target.[16] In February 2014, U.S. Central Command sponsored development and testing of the JMEWS, analyzing the ability of the programmable warhead to integrate onto the Block IV Tomahawk, giving the missile bunker buster effects to better penetrate hardened structures.[17]
In 2012, the USN studied applying Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM) technology into the Tactical Tomahawk.[18]
In 2014, Raytheon began testing Block IV improvements to attack sea and moving land targets.[19] The new passive radar seeker will pick up the electromagnetic radar signature of a target and follow it, and actively send out a signal to bounce off potential targets before impact to discriminate its legitimacy before impact.[17] Mounting the multi-mode sensor on the missile's nose would remove fuel space, but company officials believe the Navy would be willing to give up space for the sensor's new technologies.[20] The previous Tomahawk Anti-Ship Missile, retired over a decade earlier, was equipped with inertial guidance and the seeker of the Harpoon missile and there was concern with its ability to clearly discriminate between targets from a long distance, since at the time Navy sensors did not have as much range as the missile itself, which would be more reliable with the new seeker's passive detection and millimeter-waveactive radar homing.[21][22] Raytheon estimates adding the new seeker would cost $250,000 per missile.[23] Other upgrades include a sea-skimming flight path.[24][25] The first Block IV TLAMs modified with a maritime attack capability will enter service in 2021.[26]
A supersonic version of the Tomahawk is under consideration for development with a ramjet to increase its speed to Mach 3. A limiting factor to this is the dimensions of shipboard launch tubes. Instead of modifying every ship able to carry cruise missiles, the ramjet-powered Tomahawk would still have to fit within a 21-inch diameter and 20-foot long tube.[20]
In October 2015, Raytheon announced the Tomahawk had demonstrated new capabilities in a test launch, using its onboard camera to take a reconnaissance photo and transmit it to fleet headquarters. It then entered a loitering pattern until given new targeting coordinates to strike.[27]
By January 2016, Los Alamos National Laboratory was working on a project to turn unburned fuel left over when a Tomahawk reaches its target into an additional explosive force. To do this, the missile's JP-10 fuel is turned into a fuel air explosive to combine with oxygen in the air and burn rapidly. The thermobaric explosion of the burning fuel acts, in effect, as an additional warhead and can even be more powerful than the main warhead itself when there is sufficient fuel left in the case of a short range target.[15][28]
The Tomahawk Block V is planned to go into production in 2020, the Block Va being the Maritime Strike Tomahawk (MST) which allows the missile to engage a moving target at sea and the Block Vb outfitted with the JMEWS warhead for hard-target penetration.[29]
Launch systems[edit]
Each missile is stored and launched from a pressurized canister that protects it during transportation and storage, and also serves as a launch tube.[30] These canisters were racked in Armored Box Launchers (ABL), which were installed on the four reactivated Iowa-class battleships USS Iowa, USS New Jersey, USS Missouri, and USS Wisconsin. The ABLs were also installed on eight Spruance-classdestroyer, the four Virginia-classcruiser, and the nuclear cruiser USS Long Beach. These canisters are also in vertical launching systems (VLS) in other surface ships, capsule launch systems (CLS) in the later Los Angeles-classsubmarine and Virginia-classsubmarines, and in submarines' torpedo tubes.All ABL equipped ships have been decommissioned.
For submarine-launched missiles (called UGM-109s), after being ejected by gas pressure (vertically via the VLS) or by water impulse (horizontally via the torpedo tube), a solid-fuel booster is ignited to propel the missile and guide it out of the water.[31]
After achieving flight, the missile's wings are unfolded for lift, the airscoop is exposed and the turbofan engine is employed for cruise flight. Over water, the Tomahawk uses inertial guidance or GPS to follow a preset course; once over land, the missile's guidance system is aided by terrain contour matching (TERCOM). Terminal guidance is provided by the Digital Scene Matching Area Correlation (DSMAC) system or GPS, producing a claimed circular error probable of about 10 meters.
The Tomahawk Weapon System consists of the missile, Theater Mission Planning Center (TMPC)/Afloat Planning System, and either the Tomahawk Weapon Control System (on surface ships) or Combat Control System (for submarines).
Several versions of control systems have been used, including:
- v2 TWCS – Tomahawk Weapon Control System (1983), also known as 'green screens,' was based on an old tank computing system.
- v3 ATWCS – Advanced Tomahawk Weapon Control System (1994), first Commercial Off the Shelf, uses HP-UX.
- v4 TTWCS – Tactical Tomahawk Weapon Control System, (2003).
- v5 TTWCS – Next Generation Tactical Tomahawk Weapon Control System. (2006)
- Launch of a Tactical Tomahawk cruise missile from USS Stethem
- Battleship USS Missouri launching a Tomahawk missile
- Submarine launch from USS Florida.
- Launch trajectory from an Arleigh Burke-classdestroyer.
Munitions[edit]
The TLAM-D contains 166 sub-munitions in 24 canisters: 22 canisters of seven each, and two canisters of six each to conform to the dimensions of the airframe. The sub-munitions are the same type of Combined Effects Munition bomblet used in large quantities by the U.S. Air Force with the CBU-87 Combined Effects Munition. The sub-munitions canisters are dispensed two at a time, one per side. The missile can perform up to five separate target segments which enables it to attack multiple targets. However, in order to achieve a sufficient density of coverage typically all 24 canisters are dispensed sequentially from back to front.
Navigation[edit]
TERCOM – Terrain Contour Matching. A digital representation of an area of terrain is mapped based on digital terrain elevation data or stereo imagery. This map is then inserted into a TLAM mission which is then loaded onto the missile. When the missile is in flight it compares the stored map data with radar altimeter data collected as the missile overflies the map. Based on comparison results the missile's inertial navigation system is updated and the missile corrects its course. TERCOM was based on, and was a significant improvement on, 'Fingerprint,' a technology developed in 1964 for the SLAM.[32]
DSMAC – Digital Scene Matching Area Correlation. A digitized image of an area is mapped and then inserted into a TLAM mission. During the flight the missile will verify that the images that it has stored correlates with the image it sees below itself. Based on comparison results the missile's inertial navigation system is updated and the missile corrects its course.
Operational history[edit]
Remnants of a shot down Tomahawk from Operation Allied Force, showing the turbofan engine at the Museum of Aviation in Belgrade, Serbia
United States Navy[edit]
In the 1991 Gulf War, 288 Tomahawks were launched, 12 from submarines and 276 from surface ships.[33] The first salvo was fired by the Destroyer USS Paul F. Foster[34] on January 17, 1991. The attack submarines USS Pittsburgh[35] and USS Louisville followed.
On 17 January 1993, 46 Tomahawks were fired at the Zafraniyah Nuclear Fabrication Facility outside Baghdad, in response to Iraq's refusal to cooperate with UN disarmament inspectors. One missile crashed into the side of the Al Rasheed Hotel, killing two civilians.[36]
On 26 June 1993, 23 Tomahawks were fired at the Iraqi Intelligence Service's command and control center.[36]
On 10 September 1995, USS Normandy launched 13 Tomahawk missiles from the central Adriatic Sea against a key air defense radio relay tower in Bosnian Serb territory during Operation Deliberate Force.[37]
On 3 September 1996, 44 cruise missiles between UGM-109 and B-52 launched AGM-86s, were fired at air defence targets in Southern Iraq.[38][39]
On 20 August 1998, 79 Tomahawk missiles were fired simultaneously at two separate targets in Afghanistan and Sudan in retaliation for the bombings of American embassies by Al-Qaeda.[40]
On 16 December 1998, 325 Tomahawk missiles were fired at key Iraqi targets during Operation Desert Fox.[41]
In early 1999, 218 Tomahawk missiles were fired by US ships and a British submarine during Operation Allied Force against key targets in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.[42]
In October 2001, approximately 50 Tomahawk missiles struck targets in Afghanistan in the opening hours of Operation Enduring Freedom.[43][44]
During the 2003 invasion of Iraq, more than 802 Tomahawk missiles were fired at key Iraqi targets.[45]
On 3 March 2008, two Tomahawk missiles were fired at a target in Somalia by a US vessel during the Dobley airstrike, reportedly in an attempt to kill Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan, an al Qaeda militant.[46][47]
On 17 December 2009, two Tomahawk missiles were fired at targets in Yemen.[48] One of the targets was hit by a TLAM-D missile. The target was described as an 'alleged Al-Qaeda training camp' in al-Ma’jalah in al-Mahfad a region of the Abyan governorate of Yemen. Amnesty International reported that 55 people were killed in the attack, including 41 civilians (21 children, 14 women, and six men). The US and Yemen governments refused to confirm or deny involvement, but diplomatic cables released as part of United States diplomatic cables leak later confirmed the missile was fired by a US Navy ship.[8]
On 19 March 2011, 124 Tomahawk missiles[49]were fired by U.S. and British forces (112 US, 12 British)[50] against at least 20 Libyan targets around Tripoli and Misrata.[51] As of 22 March 2011, 159 UGM-109 were fired by US and UK ships against Libyan targets.[52]
On 23 September 2014, 47 Tomahawk missiles were fired by the United States from USS Arleigh Burke and USS Philippine Sea, which were operating from international waters in the Red Sea and Persian Gulf, against ISIL targets in Syria in the vicinity of Raqqa, Deir ez-Zor, Al-Hasakah and Abu Kamal,[53] and against Khorasan group targets in Syria west of Aleppo.[54]
On 13 October 2016 five Tomahawk cruise missiles were launched by USS Nitze at three radar sites in Yemen held by Houthi rebels in response to anti-ship missiles fired at US Navy ships the day before.[55]
On 6 April 2017, 59 Tomahawk missiles were launched from USS Ross (DDG-71) and USS Porter (DDG-78), targeting Shayrat Airbase near Homs, in Syria. The strike was in response to a chemical weapons attack, an act allegedly carried out by Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad. U.S. Central Command stated in a press release that Tomahawk missiles hit 'aircraft, hardened aircraft shelters, petroleum and logistical storage, ammunition supply bunkers, defense systems, and radars'.[56] Initial U.S. reports claimed 'approximately 20 planes' were destroyed, and that 58 out of the 59 cruise missiles launched 'severely degraded or destroyed' their intended target.[57][58] A later report by US Secretary of Defense James Mattis claimed that the strike destroyed about 20% of the Syrian government's operational aircraft.[59] Syrian state-run media claimed that nine civilians, including four children living in nearby villages were killed and another seven wounded as a result of the strike after missiles fell on their homes,[60][61] but The Pentagon said civilians were not targeted.[62] According to the satellite images the runways[63] and the taxiways have been undamaged and combat flights from the attacked airbase resumed on 7 April a few hours after the attack, although U.S. officials did not state that the runway was a target.[64][65][66]
An independent bomb damage assessment conducted by ImageSat International counted hits on 44 targets, with some targets being hit by more than one missile; these figures were determined using satellite images of the airbase 10 hours after the strike.[67] However, the Russian defense ministry contends that the combat effectiveness of the attack was 'extremely low';[68][69] only 23 missiles hit the base destroying six aircraft, and it did not know where the other 36 landed.[70][71] Russian television news, citing a Syrian source at the airfield, said that nine planes were destroyed by the strikes (5 Su-22M3s, 1 Su-22M4, and 3 Mig-23ML) and that all planes were thought to have been out of action at the time.[72]Al-Masdar News reported that 15 fighter jets were damaged or destroyed and that the destruction of fuel tankers caused several explosions and a large fire.[73] However, Lost Armour's online photographic database, for vehicle losses in the War in Syria, has images of 10 destroyed aircraft at Shayrat airbase.[74] Some observers conclude that the Russian government—and therefore also the Syrian government—was warned and Syria had enough time to move most of the planes to another base.[75][76] The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said the strike damaged over a dozen hangars, a fuel depot, and an air defense base.[77][78]
On April 14 2018, the US launched 66 Tomahawk cruise missiles at Syrian targets near Damascus and Homs, as part of the 2018 bombing of Damascus and Homs.[79] These strikes were done in retaliation for alleged Douma chemical attack. The United States Department of Defense said Syria fired 40 defensive missiles at the allied weapons but did not hit any targets.[80] The Russian military said that Syrian air defenses shot down 71 of the 103 missiles launched by the US and its allies.[81]
Number of Tomahawk missiles fired | ||
---|---|---|
Operation | Year | Number |
Gulf War | 1991 | 288 |
Part of Iraq disarmament | 17 January 1993 | 46 |
Part of Iraq disarmament | 26 June 1993 | 23 |
Operation Deliberate Force | 10 September 1995 | 13 |
Part of Iraq disarmament | 3 September 1996 | 44 |
Operation Infinite Reach | 20 August 1998 | 79 |
Operation Desert Fox | 16 December 1998 | 325 |
Operation Allied Force | 1999 | 218 |
Operation Enduring Freedom | 2001 | 50 |
2003 invasion of Iraq | 2003 | 802 |
Dobley airstrike | 3 March 2008 | 2 |
Against an Al-Qaeda training camp in Yemen | 17 December 2009 | 2 |
2011 military intervention in Libya | 19 March 2011 | 124 |
Military intervention against ISIL | 23 September 2014 | 47 |
in response to anti-ship missiles fired by Houthis in Yemen | 13 October 2016 | 5 |
Shayrat missile strike | 6 April 2017 | 59 |
2018 bombing of Damascus and Homs | 13 April 2018 | 66 |
Royal Navy[edit]
In 1995 the US agreed to sell 65 Tomahawks to the UK for torpedo-launch from their nuclear attack submarines. The first missiles were acquired and test-fired in November 1998; all Royal Navy fleet submarines are now Tomahawk capable, including the Astute-class.[82][83][84][85] The Kosovo War in 1999 saw the Swiftsure-class HMS Splendid become the first British submarine to fire the Tomahawk in combat. The UK subsequently bought 20 more Block III to replenish stocks.[86] The Royal Navy has since fired Tomahawks during the 2000s Afghanistan War, in Operation Telic as the British contribution to the 2003 Iraq War, and during Operation Ellamy in Libya in 2011.
In April 2004, the UK and US governments reached an agreement for the British to buy 64 of the new generation of Tomahawk missile—the Block IV or TacTom missile.[87] It entered service with the Royal Navy on 27 March 2008, three months ahead of schedule.[88] In July 2014 the US approved the sale to the UK of a further 65 submarine-launched Block IV's at a cost of US$140m including spares and support;[89] as of 2011 the Block III missiles were on British books at £1.1m and the Block IV at £0.87m including VAT.[90]
The Sylver Vertical Launching System on the new Type 45 destroyer is claimed by its manufacturers to have the capability to fire the Tomahawk, although the A50 launcher carried by the Type 45 is too short for the weapon (the longer A70 silo would be required). Nevertheless, the Type 45 has been designed with weight and space margin for a strike-length Mk41 or Sylver A70 silo to be retrofitted, allowing Type 45 to use the TLAM Block IV if required. The new Type 26 frigates will have strike-length Mk41 VLS tubes. SYLVER user France is developing MdCN, a version of the Storm Shadow/Scalp cruise missile that has a shorter range but a higher speed than Tomahawk and can be launched from the SYLVER system.
United States Air Force[edit]
The Air Force is a former operator of the nuclear-armed version of the Tomahawk, the BGM-109G Gryphon.[91]
Other users[edit]
The Netherlands (2005) and Spain (2002 and 2005) were interested in acquiring the Tomahawk system, but the orders were later cancelled in 2007 and 2009 respectively.[92][93]
In 2009 the Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States stated that Japan would be concerned if the TLAM-N were retired, but the government of Japan has denied that it had expressed any such view.[94]
It is believed[who?] that the SLCM version of the Popeye was developed by Israel after the US Clinton administration refused an Israeli request in 2000 to purchase Tomahawk SLCM's because of international Missile Technology Control Regime proliferation rules.[95]
As of March 12, 2015 Poland has expressed interest in purchasing long-range Tomahawk missiles for its future submarines.[96]
Operators[edit]
Map with Tomahawk operators in blue
Current operators[edit]
- United Kingdom
- United States
See also[edit]
References[edit]
- ^ ab'United States Department Of Defense Fiscal Year 2017 Budget Request Program Acquisition Cost By Weapon System'(pdf). Office Of The Under Secretary Of Defense (Comptroller) / Chief Financial Officer. January 2016. p. 63.
- ^ abKristensen, Hans M. (March 18, 2013). 'US Navy Instruction Confirms Retirement of Nuclear Tomahawk Cruise Missile'. Strategic Security. Federation of American Scientists. Archived from the original on July 9, 2014. Retrieved July 9, 2014.
- ^ abcdefghij'Tomahawk'. Missile Threat. CSIS. June 15, 2018.
- ^Tomahawk cruise missiles proved to be difficult targets for Russian electronic warfare systems - Navyrecognition.com, 18 April 2017
- ^Schlueter, Jim (March 9, 1993). 'McDonnell Douglas delivers its first Tomahawk cruise missile with Block III improvements' (Press release). St. Louis: McDonnell Douglas Aerospace. PRNewswire. Retrieved 2019-02-15.
- ^'BGM-109 Tomahawk - Smart Weapons'. Federation of American Scientists. Archived from the original on 20 February 1999. Retrieved 8 October 2015.
- ^ abcBurgess, Richard (February 2, 2018). 'Nuke Posture: More Flexible Response Posed for Navy Submarines'. Sea Power.
- ^ ab'United States: Cluster Munition Ban Policy'. Landmine monitor, US 2011 report. International Campaign to Ban Landmines. 22 October 2010.
- ^ abPetty, Dan. 'Fact File: Tomahawk Cruise Missile'. The US Navy. Retrieved 8 October 2015.
- ^Pike, John. 'BGM-109 Tomahawk – Smart Weapons'. Global Security.
- ^'Tactical Tomahawk Missile'. Navy Programs(PDF). Department of Defense. 2002. pp. 219–222.
- ^'Tactical Tomahawk Weapons Control System (TTWCS)'. Lockheed Martin.
- ^Company, Raytheon. 'Navy Posts Successful Test of Raytheon's Block IV Tomahawk Cruise Missile'. www.prnewswire.com. Archived from the original on 2018-05-23. Retrieved 2018-05-22.
- ^Communications, Raytheon Corporate. 'Raytheon: Tomahawk Cruise Missile'.
- ^ abEshel, Tamir. 'Tomahawk Cruise Missiles to Become Dual-Mission, Assume Anti-Ship Role'. Defense Update. Raytheon.
- ^U.S. Navy Completes First Test of New Warhead for Tomahawk Block IV Missile - Raytheon press release via PRNewswire.com, 24 October 2010
- ^ abNavy Wants Its Tomahawks to Bust More Bunkers - Defensetech.org, 14 February 2014
- ^'Viability Study associated with Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile - Federal Business Opportunities: Opportunities'.
- ^Raytheon Corporate Communications. 'Raytheon'. Archived from the original on 12 November 2014. Retrieved 8 October 2015.
- ^ abFacing End of Tomahawk Production, Raytheon Plays Industrial Base CardArchived 2015-09-04 at the Wayback Machine - Nationaldefensemagazine.org, 2 April 2014
- ^New Seeker Could Put Tomahawk In Long-Range Anti-Ship Missile Race - Aviationweek.com, 12 November 2014
- ^US Navy: More Can Be Done If Risks Are AcceptedArchived 2015-12-03 at the Wayback Machine - Militarytimes.com, 1 December 2015
- ^Pentagon Budget Requests $2B for Tomahawks, $2.9B for SM-6 - Defensenews.com, 3 February 2016
- ^Beckhusen, Robert (February 10, 2016). 'Ship-Killing Missiles Are the Pentagon's Big Budget Winner'. War is Boring.
- ^Eshel, Tamir. 'Enhanced Tomahawk cruise missile engages moving targets'. Defense Update. Raytheon.
- ^U.S. Navy Anti-Ship Tomahawk Set for Surface Ships, Subs Starting in 2021 - News.USNI.org, 18 February 2016
- ^US Navy, Raytheon demonstrate network-enabled Tomahawk cruise missiles in flight - Raytheon press release via PRNewswire, 5 October 2015
- ^Tomahawk Missiles Will Get Twice As Deadly By Blowing Up Their Own Fuel - Popular Mechanics, 15 January 2016
- ^Navy’s New Tomahawk Plan Targets Ships, Bunkers and Distance. Breaking Defense. 6 May 2019.
- ^GAO (October 1997). Test and evaluation impact of DOD. DIANE Publishing. ISBN978-1428979291. Retrieved 2013-08-30.
- ^'AGM-109/BGM-109 Tomahawk'. Forecast International. January 2007. Retrieved 15 February 2019.
- ^'SLAM Supersonic Low-Altitude Missile'. GlobalSecurity.org. Retrieved January 25, 2014.
- ^Robinson, John (5 September 1996). 'Tomahawk launch breaks submarine silence'. Defense Daily. Archived from the original on 4 September 2015. Retrieved 23 May 2015 – via HighBeam Research.
- ^Paul F Foster(PDF), Navy.
- ^'Pittsburgh IV (SSN 720)'. Navy.
- ^ abPike, John (13 January 1993). 'Operation Southern Watch'. Global Security.
- ^Pike, John. 'Operation Deliberate Force'. Global security.
- ^'2nd Cruise Missile Strikes in Iraq'. Emergency. 9 February 2005. Archived from the original on 9 February 2005.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
- ^Pike, John. 'Operation Desert Strike'. Global security.
- ^Michaels, J. (19 March 2013). 'The Discourse Trap and the US Military: From the War on Terror to the Surge'. Springer – via Google Books.
- ^Pike, John. 'Operation Desert Fox Order of Battle'. Global Security.
- ^Koplow, David A. (30 November 2009). 'Death by Moderation: The U.S. Military's Quest for Useable Weapons'. Cambridge University Press – via Google Books.
- ^Holmes, Tony (20 November 2012). 'F-14 Tomcat Units of Operation Enduring Freedom'. Bloomsbury Publishing – via Google Books.
- ^Pike, John. 'BGM-109 Tomahawk - Operational Use'. Global Security.
- ^Pike, John. 'BGM-109 Tomahawk - Smart Weapons'. Global Security. Retrieved 8 October 2015.
- ^'U.S. Forces Fire Missiles Into Somalia at a Kenyan'. The New York Times. 4 March 2008.
- ^Nathan Hodge, 'US strikes Al-Qaeda target located in southern Somalia,' JDW, 12 March 2008 (Vol 45, Issue 11), p.18
- ^Cruise Missiles Strike Yemen. ABC News (2009-12-18). Retrieved on 2013-08-16.
- ^'Live blog: allied airstrikes continue against Gadhafi forces'. CNN. 2011-03-20.
- ^'Libya: Navy running short of Tomahawk missiles'. Telegraph. 23 March 2011. Retrieved 8 October 2015.
- ^'U.S. launches first missiles against Gadhafi forces'. CNN. 2011-03-19.
- ^'U.S. aviators rescued; Gadhafi remains defiant'. CNN. 11 May 2011.
- ^'Sept. 23: U.S. Military, Partner Nations Conduct Airstrikes Against ISIL in Syria'. U.S. Central Command. 23 September 2014. Archived from the original on 25 September 2014. Retrieved 23 September 2014.
- ^'Al-Qaeda Khorasan cell in Syria attack 'was imminent''. BBC News. 23 September 2014. Retrieved 23 Sep 2014.
- ^Dan, Lamothe (13 October 2016). 'Navy launches Tomahawk missiles at rebel sites in Yemen after attacks on U.S. ships'. The Washington Post. Retrieved 13 October 2016.
- ^'Statement from Pentagon Spokesman Capt. Jeff Davis on U.S. strike in Syria'. U.S. Central Command. 7 April 2017. Retrieved 7 April 2017.
- ^CNN, Laura Smith-Spark and Barbara Starr. 'US investigates possible Russia role in Syria chemical attack'.
- ^Starr, Barbara; Diamond, Jeremy (April 7, 2017). 'Trump launches military strike against Syria'. CNN.
- ^Westcott, Ben (11 April 2017). 'US missile strike took out 20% of Syria's airforce, Mattis claims'. CNN.
- ^CNN, Faith Karimi and Jason Hanna. 'What you need to know about US strike on Syrian air base'. cnn.com. Retrieved 11 April 2017.
- ^'4 children among 9 civilians dead in US airstrike on Syria strike: state media'. The Express Tribune. 7 April 2017. Retrieved 11 April 2017.
- ^Rosenfeld, Everett (7 April 2017). 'Trump launches attack on Syria with 59 Tomahawk missiles'. CNBC. Retrieved 11 April 2017.
- ^'Why didn't the US crater Syria's runways?'. The National.
- ^'Syrian warplanes take off from same air base US bombarded'. New York Post. 7 April 2017.
- ^'Syrian warplanes take off once again from air base bombed by US Tomahawks'. Telegraph. Retrieved 11 April 2017.
- ^'Syrian Air Force Resumes Flights From US-Attacked Airfield - Military Source'. Sputnik News. Retrieved 11 April 2017.
- ^'ISI first to analyze Shayrat airfield missile attack'. ImageStat International. Archived from the original on 13 April 2017. Retrieved 13 April 2017.
- ^'Syrian jets take off from air base hit by US'. ABC News. 8 April 2017. Retrieved 11 April 2017.
- ^'Russia plans to bolster Syrian air defences, and derides US over 'extremely low' effectiveness of bombing'. The Independent. 7 April 2017. Retrieved 11 April 2017.
- ^Hennessy-Fiske, Molly; Bulos, Nabih (7 April 2017). 'Syrians report 15 dead in U.S. airstrike'. Los Angeles Times. Irbil. Retrieved 7 April 2017.
- ^Konashenkov, Igor (7 April 2017). 'MoD to hold briefing after US strike in Syria – TAPE FEED'. RT. Retrieved 7 April 2017.
- ^'Nine Syrian planes destroyed by US strike on airfield'. ITV News. 7 April 2017.
- ^'Latest update from Syrian airbase attacked by US Navy'. Al-Masdar News. Retrieved 7 April 2017.
- ^'Losses of armored vehicles and aviation in Syria'. lostarmour.info.
- ^Dolejší, Karel (7 April 2017). 'Pokud Trump nařídí útok na Asada, má v kapse 'velkou' dohodu s Putinem' [If Trump orders an attack on Assad, he has 'big' deal with Putin]. Britské listy (in Czech). Retrieved 8 April 2017.
- ^Dolejší, Karel (7 April 2017). 'Noční útok v Sýrii: Rusové byli varováni, tedy i Asad. Provoz ostřelované základny lze obnovit v řádu týdnů' [Night attack in Syria: The Russians have been warned, including Assad. Operation bombarded bases can be restored in a matter of weeks]. Britské listy. Retrieved 8 April 2017.
- ^'The Latest: Group says at least 4 killed in US Syria attack'. Idaho Statesman. Retrieved 7 April 2017.
- ^'Syrian monitor says airbase almost destroyed in strike'. Reuters UK. Retrieved 7 April 2017.
- ^Jenny Gathright (April 14, 2018). 'PHOTOS: 2 Syrian Chemical Weapons Sites Before And After Missile Strikes'. NPR.
- ^Gareth Davies (April 14, 2018). 'Syria fired 40 missiles 'at nothing' after allied air strikes destroyed three Assad chemical sites'. The Telegraph – via Yahoo News.
- ^Peter Beaumont; Andrew Roth (14 April 2018). 'Russia claims Syria air defences shot down 71 of 103 missiles'. The Guardian.
- ^'Astute Class Submarines'. BAE Systems Maritime – Submarines. BAE Systems. Retrieved 12 November 2013.
- ^'New Royal Navy Submarine Fires First Tomahawk Missiles Across North American Skies'. Royal Navy/MOD. Archived from the original on 12 November 2013. Retrieved 12 November 2013.
- ^'Awesome Astute 'surpassed every expectation' on her toughest test yet'. Royal Navy/MOD. Archived from the original on 12 November 2013. Retrieved 12 November 2013.
- ^'Astute on show in the world's biggest naval base'. Royal Navy/MOD. Archived from the original on 12 November 2013. Retrieved 12 November 2013.
- ^'House of Commons Hansard Written Answers for 2 Nov 1999 (pt 7)'. Retrieved 8 October 2015.
- ^'House of Commons Hansard Written Ministerial Statements for 21 Apr 2004 (pt 1)'. Retrieved 8 October 2015.
- ^'World-Class Missile Achieves In-Service Date'. Royal Navy LIVE. 4 April 2008. Archived from the original on 2008-10-18.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
- ^'United Kingdom - Tomahawk Block IV Torpedo Launched Land-Attack Missiles'. Defense Security Cooperation Agency. 1 July 2014.
- ^'Daily Hansard - Written Answers to Questions'. UK Parliament. 17 May 2011.
- ^General Dynamics/McDonnell Douglas BGM-109G 'Gryphon' Ground-launched Cruise MissileArchived 17 February 2006 at the Wayback Machine
- ^No Tomahawks for defence, jets up for sale - New Europe[permanent dead link]
- ^País, Ediciones El (12 October 2009). 'Defensa comunica a EE UU que no comprará misiles Tomahawk' – via elpais.com.
- ^'Japanese Government Rejects TLAM/N Claim'. Federation Of American Scientists. Retrieved 8 October 2015.
- ^'Submarine Proliferation: Israel Current Capabilities'. Archived from the original on July 4, 2007. Retrieved August 6, 2011.
- ^'Poland To Launch Sub Tender, Eyes Tomahawks'. Defense News. 12 March 2015. Retrieved 8 October 2015.
External links[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to BGM-109 Tomahawk. |
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tomahawk_(missile)&oldid=899461237'
Diagram of a British, 250lb General Purpose Bomb Mark 1, used during the early part of World War 2
A general-purpose bomb is an air-dropped bomb intended as a compromise between blast damage, penetration, and fragmentation in explosive effect. They are designed to be effective against enemy troops, vehicles, and buildings.
- 2Modern GP bombs
- 2.1Modern American GP bombs: the Mark 80 series
Characteristics[edit]
General-purpose (GP) bombs use a thick-walled metal casing with explosive filler (typically TNT, Composition B, or Tritonal in NATO or United States service) composing about 30% to 40% of the bomb's total weight. The British term for a bomb of this type is 'medium case' or 'medium capacity' (MC). The GP bomb is a common weapon of fighter bomber and attack aircraft because it is useful for a variety of tactical applications and relatively cheap.
General-purpose bombs are often identified by their weight (e.g., 500 lb, 227 kg). In many cases this is strictly a nominal weight (the counterpart to the caliber of a firearm), and the actual weight of each individual weapon may vary depending on its retardation, fusing, carriage, and guidance systems. For example, the actual weight of a U.S. M117 bomb, nominally 750 lb (340 kg), is typically around 820 lb (372 kg).
Most modern air-dropped GP bombs are designed to minimize drag for external carriage on aircraft lacking bomb bays.
In low-altitude attacks, there is a danger of the attacking aircraft being caught in the blast of its own weapons. To address this problem, GP bombs are often fitted with retarders, parachutes or pop-out fins that slow the bomb's descent to allow the aircraft time to escape the detonation.
GP bombs can be fitted with a variety of fuzes and fins for different uses. One notable example is the 'daisy cutter' fuze used in Vietnam War era American weapons, an extended probe designed to ensure that the bomb would detonate on contact (even with foliage) rather than burying itself in earth or mud, which would reduce its effectiveness. (This was not the first instance of such devices. As early as World War II, the Luftwaffe was using extended-nose fuzes on bombs dropped by Stuka dive-bombers and other aircraft for exactly the same reason. A blast several feet above the ground is many times more effective and has a far greater radius than one that is delayed until the bomb is below the surface.)
GP bombs are commonly used as the warheads for more sophisticated precision-guided munitions. Using various types of seeker and electrically controlled fins turns a basic 'iron' bomb into a laser-guided bomb (like the U.S. Paveway series), an electro-optical guided bomb, or, more recently, GPS-guided weapon (like the U.S. JDAM). The combination is cheaper than a true guided missile (and can be more easily upgraded or replaced in service), but is substantially more accurate than an unguided bomb.
Modern GP bombs[edit]
Modern American GP bombs: the Mark 80 series[edit]
A Mk. 82 GP bomb loaded on an F/A-18 Hornet, showing nose fuze and textured thermal insulation
During the Korean War and Vietnam War the U.S. used older designs like the M117 and M118, which had an explosive content about 65% higher than most contemporary weapons. Although some of these weapons remain in the U.S. arsenal, they are little used and the M117 is primarily carried only by the B-52 Stratofortress.
The primary U.S. GP bombs are the Mark 80 series. This class of weapons uses a shape known as Aero 1A, designed by Ed Heinemann of Douglas Aircraft as the result of studies in 1946. It has a length-to-diameter ratio of about 8:1, and results in minimal drag for the carrier aircraft. The Mark 80 series was not used in combat until the Vietnam War, but has since replaced most earlier GP weapons. It includes four basic weapon types:
- Mark 81 – nominal weight 250 pounds (113 kg)
- Mark 82 – nominal weight 500 pounds (227 kg)
- Mark 83 – nominal weight 1,000 pounds (454 kg)
- Mark 84 – nominal weight 2,000 pounds (907 kg)
Vietnam service showed the Mk 81 'Firecracker' to be insufficiently effective, and it was withdrawn from U.S. service. However, recently, precision-guided variants of the Mk 81 bomb have begun a return to service, based on U.S. experience in Iraq after 2003, and the desire to reduce collateral damage compared to Mk 82 and larger bombs (e.g., when attacking a single small building in a populated area).
Since the Vietnam War and the 1967 USS Forrestal fire, United States Navy and United States Marine Corps GP bombs are distinguished by a thick ablative fire-retardant coating, which is designed to delay any potential accidental explosion in the event of a shipboard fire. Land-based air forces typically do not use such coatings, largely because they add some 30 lb (14 kg) to the weight of the complete weapon.[citation needed] Fire is less a danger in a land-based facility, where the personnel can be evacuated with relative ease, and the building be the only loss. At sea, the crew and munitions share a facility (the ship), and thus are in much more danger of fire reaching munitions (which tend to be more closely packed, due to space limitations). Also, losing a munitions storage building on land is far cheaper than sacrificing an entire naval vessel, even if one could easily evacuate the crew.
All Mk80 bombs have both nose and tail fuze wells and can accept a variety of fuzes. Various nose and tail kits can be fitted to adapt the weapon for a variety of roles.
In the Mk 80 series bomb bodies is also used in the following weapons:
- BDU-50 A practice (no explosive) version of the Mk 82 bomb body
- BDU-56 A practice (no explosive) version of the Mk 84 bomb body
Guidance accessories for a 500lb body and a Laser-Guided Training Round, bottom
Smart bomb kits[edit]
Dumb Mk 80 bombs could be converted to smart bombs with attached kits:
- GBU-12D Paveway II (Mk 82) laser-guided
- GBU-16B Paveway II (Mk 83) laser-guided
- GBU-24B Paveway III (Mk 84) laser-guided
- GBU-38 JDAM (Mk 82) INS/GPS guided
- GBU-32 JDAM (Mk 83) INS/GPS guided
- GBU-31 JDAM (Mk 84) INS/GPS guided
- GBU-X[1][2][3][4][5][6] - a new guided general-purpose bomb under development.
Snake Eye
Retarded versions[edit]
- Mk 82 Snake Eye was a standard Mk 82 with folded, retarding petals.
- Mk 82 Retarded was a standard Mk 82 with a ballute.
- Mk 83 Retarded was a standard Mk 83 with a ballute.
- Mk 84 Retarded was a standard Mk 84 with a ballute.
Modern British GP bombs[edit]
The principal modern British bombs are 540 lb (245 kg) and 1,000 lb (454 kg), with a wide variety of fin, fuze, and retarder options. Usage is increasingly dominated by guided versions.
WWII-era British General Purpose bombs[edit]
During WWII the British adopted a description of general-purpose bombs as medium capacity (MC) bombs. The 1000 lb MC was developed from 1942 to replace the existing 1000 lb GP (General Purpose) bomb. Initially using most of the components of the 1000 lb GP it was decided to give it a new tail and it was built with a half-inch thick wall. Fillings could be Amatex, Amatol, Minol, RDX and others. Actual weight was around 1020 lb (464 kg).[7]It was introduced to service in 1943 and about a quarter of a million were produced by the end of the war.
A 4000 lb GP bomb, 1943
- 40 lb General Purpose bomb – produced 1937 to 1941
- 50 lb General Purpose Bomb – not produced
- 120 lb General Purpose Bomb – abandoned project
- 250 lb General Purpose Bomb (1926 onwards) – replaced by 250 lb MC in 1942
- 500 lb General Purpose Bomb (1926 onwards) – replaced by 500 lb MC in 1942
- 1000 lb General Purpose Bomb (1939 onwards) – replaced by 1000 lb MC
- 1900 lb General Purpose Bomb (1941 onwards)
- 4000 lb General Purpose Bomb (1943) – replaced by 4000 lb HC
Soviet and Russian GP bombs[edit]
A 1946 FAB-250 bomb
A 1954 FAB-500 bomb
The Russian term for general-purpose bomb is fugasnaya aviatsionnaya bomba (FAB) and followed by the bomb's nominal weight in kilograms. Most Russian iron bombs have circular ring airfoils rather than the fins used by Western types.
In 1946 the Soviet Union developed a series of freefall bombs in four sizes 250 kg (550 lb), 500 kg (1,100 lb), 1,500 kg (3,300 lb), and 3,000 kg (6,600 lb) and sharing a single nose and a single tail fuze. The bomb could be dropped from up to 12,000 m (40,000 ft) and up to 1,000 km/h (625 mph). The original, 1946-series bombs had poor ballistic characteristics at supersonic speed, and their construction was fragile. As an interim measure, upgraded versions of the bombs were built with thicker walls and no nose fuze. The thick-walled version of the bombs were built until 1956.
The 1954 series of high-drag bombs was built in six sizes: 250 kg (550 lb), 500 kg (1,100 lb), 1500 kg (3,300 lb), 3,000 kg (6,600 lb), 5,000 kg (11,000 lb), and 9,000 kg (20,000 lb). A feature of the 1954 series of bombs is the ballistic ring on the nose of the bomb which acts as a vortex generator to aid the bombs stabilizers.[8] The smaller (less than 3,000 kg) bombs had a single nose and a single tail fuze, while the larger weapons shared a single nose fuze and two base fuzes. The FAB-9000 (9,000 kg/20,000 lb) weapon was roughly comparable to the wartimeGrand Slam bomb. It was used by Russian aircraft designers as a substitute for early nuclear weapons when determining the size and clearances of bomb bays.
In 1962 a new series of streamlined, low-drag bombs was introduced, designed for external carriage by fighter-bomber aircraft rather than in internal bays. They come in only two sizes, 250 kg (550 lb) and 500 kg (1,100 lb). Both bombs have a single nose fuze.
Both the 54 and 62 series designs remain in use. The most common of these are the FAB-100, FAB-250, FAB-500, FAB-750, and FAB-1500, roughly corresponding to the U.S. Mark 80 series. These have seen widespread service in Russia, Warsaw Pact nations, and various export countries.
Larger bombs with less streamlined shapes also remained in the Soviet arsenal, primarily for use by heavy bombers. In the Iran–Iraq War, FAB-5000 (5,000 kg/11,000 lb) and FAB-9000 (9,000 kg/20,000 lb) bombs were dropped by Iraqi Air ForceTupolev Tu-22 bombers, generally against large, fixed targets in Iran.[9] In Afghanistan in the 1980s, Soviet Tupolev Tu-16 and Tupolev Tu-22M bombers used massive FAB-1500, FAB-3000, FAB-5000NG, and FAB-9000 bombs to devastating effect during the Panjshir offensives.
- FAB-100[10]
- FAB-250M-54[11]
- KAB-250[12]
- KAB-250S-E[13][14]
French GP bombs[edit]
France's GP bombs, marketed by Matra and built by the Société des Ateliers Mécanique de Port-sur-Sambre (SAMP) are made in a variety of types with nominal weights from 50 kg (110 lb) to 1,000 kg (2,205 lb). The most common are the 250 kg (550 lb) EU2 and T25, 400 kg (882 lb) T200, and 1,000 kg (2,205 lb) BL4.
- Société des Ateliers Mécaniques de Pont-sur-Sambre (SAMP) 125-kg-General-Purpose bomb; (analogue to Mk.81)
- SAMP BL EU2 (250-kg-Retarded General-Purpose bomb)
- SAMP EU2 (250-kg-General-Purpose bomb; analogue to Mk.82)
- SAMP 25FE (250-kg-General-Purpose bomb; analogue to Mk.82)
- SAMP T200 (400-kg-General-Purpose bomb; analogue to Mk.83)
- SAMP BL4 (1000-kg-General-Purpose bomb; analogue to Mk.84)
Other nations[edit]
Other countries, including Australia,[15] Azerbaijan, Brazil, Chile, Greece,[16] India, Israel, Pakistan, Poland, Portugal, Romania, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, and Turkey, manufacture their own bombs, most of which are either licensed versions of the U.S. Mark 80 series or close copies.
See also[edit]
- Blockbuster bomb – chosen for blast effect
References[edit]
- Citations
![550 550](/uploads/1/2/4/9/124912887/313361334.png)
- ^'DUBAI: Textron-Thales mini-bomb wrapping up flight test campaign'. FlightGlobal.com. 9 November 2015. Retrieved 14 February 2017.
- ^'USAF reveals slimmed-down SACM air-to-air missile concept'. FlightGlobal.com. 25 February 2016. Retrieved 14 February 2017.
- ^http://www.janes.com/article/57493/raytheon-selected-to-deliver-next-generation-tactical-air-to-air-missile-solutions
- ^'Raytheon to research tactical missile capabilities'. UPI.com. Retrieved 14 February 2017.
- ^'SACM: Affordable, Highly-Lethal Missile - Fighter Sweep'. FighterSweep.com. 7 March 2016. Retrieved 14 February 2017.
- ^https://insidedefense.com/inside-air-force/textron-explores-capabilities-next-generation-gbu-x-munition
- ^'1000lb Medium Capacity Bomb'. WWII Equipment.
- ^Gordon, Yefim (2004). Soviet / Russian aircraft weapons : since World War Two. Hinkley: Midland Publishing. p. 158. ISBN1857801881. OCLC56650196.
- ^'Bombed by Blinders'. Air Combat Information Group. December 5, 2010.
- ^http://weaponsystems.net/weaponsystem/HH12%20-%20FAB%20M62.html
- ^http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/fab-250.htm
- ^http://www.janes.com/article/55095/russia-s-kab-250-guided-bomb-to-complete-trials-this-year
- ^http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/bombs.htm
- ^http://www.cat-uxo.com/#/aircraft-bombs-russian/4583661419
- ^'Bombs | Australian Munitions'. Australian Munitions. Retrieved 27 December 2016.
- ^'Ordtech General Purpose Aircraft Bombs Mk81, Mk82, Mk83, Mk84'. Ordtech Military Industries. Retrieved 27 December 2016.
- Bibliography
- Clancy, Tom. Fighter Wing. London: HarperCollins, 1995. ISBN0-00-255527-1.
- Yefim, Gordon. Soviet/Russian Aircraft Weapons Since World War Two. Midland Publishing, 2005. ISBN1-85780-188-1.
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=General-purpose_bomb&oldid=902134292'